Difference between revisions of "Asia"

Latest revision as of 21:48, 28 April 2014

50 countries are located in Asia.

Table: Practices and technologies, international agreements, UN cloning vote

Key

Practices and technologies

• PROHIBITED: This practice is prohibited by national law or policies having the force of law.
• regulated: This practice is allowed and regulated by national law or policies having the force of law.
• permitted: This practice is allowed by national law or policies having the force of law, but is not regulated.
• allowed: This practice is allowed by national law or policies having the force of law, but social uses are not prohibited.
• social uses prohibited: Social (or nonmedical) use of this practice is prohibited by national law or policies having the force of law.
• commercial prohibited: Commercial use of this practice is prohibited by national law or policies having the force of law, but non-commercial use is allowed.
• commercial allowed: Commercial use of this practice is allowed by national law or policies having the force of law.
• permitted: This practice is allowed by national law or policies having the force of law, but policies concerning compensation are unknown.
• unrecognized: Surrogacy contracts are explicitly unrecognized by national law or by other mechanism which carries the force of law.
• no policy: This practice is not addressed by national law or policies having the force of law.
• ?: It is unknown whether this practice is addressed by national law or policies having the force of law.

Note: The categories defined in the key and used in the table characterize the polices in any given country in a broad manner. Consult the page for each country for more detailed accounts of current policies.
 

International agreements

• RATIFIED: This country has ratified this measure, and thus agrees to abide by its provisions.
• signed: This country has signed this measure, indicating an intent to ratify it.
• blank cell: This country has neither signed nor ratified this measure.

2005 UN Cloning Vote

• YES: This country voted in favor of the Declaration, indicating support for a ban on both reproductive and research cloning.
• no: This country voted against the Declaration, indicating support for a ban on reproductive cloning only.
• abstain: This country took an official position of abstaining from voting on the Declaration.
• no vote: This country’s delegate was absent at the time of the vote, or otherwise refrained from voting.

You can click the icon in any column heading to sort by that column. To sort the other direction, click it again.